Detailed Notes on h4831sc load data

I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was producing additional strain and was slower when compared to the previous things. I don't remember if I even experimented with common h4831 or not; I'm considering not.

H4831SC Powder offered in inventory now. Ballistically, this Intense Extruded powder is the exact copy of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain dimensions, hence, the designation SC or shorter Slash. The shorter, much more compact kernels allow the powder to flow through the powder measures additional efficiently, helping to alleviate the constant cutting of granules.

The truth that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be seeing increased velocities obtained with that powder, versus Everything you've seen While using the IMR things. Also fantastic powder, but considerably much better suited to a little bit scaled-down circumstances having a bit considerably less capability.

Sweet!! I'll pick some up and provides it a check out. Thank you men, I enjoy it! I'll let you know very well what I uncover. I do have a couple of fifty percent pound of 4350 I can try out that very first and find out what occurs.

Yup or it will not likely do the job perfectly. And since the OP has a load working with Varget I'd try to find somebody to trade with. May well come up h4831 vs h4831sc with a get acquire scenario.

Given that there will not seem like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can some of you present a starting point with this combination and points to think about when Doing the job this Load up?

i've utilized the two and applied the very same costs and have not been able to convey to any h4831 vs h4831sc noticable distinctions with general performance. the SC Edition meters a little smoother is about all. any remarks??

It's possible you'll either: 1) Continue and have the goods mentioned beneath instantly removed from your browsing cart:

The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Severe powder.

Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder h4831sc is the precise copy of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain size, consequently, the designation SC or quick Slash. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation through the powder measures additional easily, helping to ease the consistent chopping of granules.

As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the exact same/equivalent powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.

It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Observed a node and shot some groups. I shot a .six 5 shot team today. It's just a little slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Thanks for the recommendation, it's superior to understand that I have bought choices when one or the opposite powder is dried up.

Can I think that H4831 could be substituted for H4831sc ? I am aware the Actual physical big difference but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I believe not but I am not a hundred% guaranteed.

The point that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is precisely why you are viewing larger velocities received with that powder, rather than what you've observed With all the IMR stuff.